The Government Needs to Spend More Wisely

I caught Your Money and How They Spend It on Wednesday last week.  The series is simple, it’s looking at how the UK government collects and spends public money.  We all know the government collects revenue from taxes and uses that money to provide public services.  Everything from welfare and pensions, to the NHS to defence comes from the revenue it raises.

I think we’re all well aware the nation is in a hole because we’ve been spending more than we’ve been earning for some time.  As such we’re all equally aware of the austerity measures and cuts we’re having to impose and I’m behind them.  We do need to reign in spending and get our house in order.  Cuts are obviously one way to do this and something that must be done, but one question the programme raised was about how the government spends our money, and do they do it well?

I’ve long held the belief that there is massive scope for efficiency improvements in government spending and that we don’t get anywhere near good value as taxpayers.  We’ve all seen the headlines about projects that were late or overran, or were not fit for purpose.  There was one on the programme I had never heard of. Continue reading

One of the Problems at Sony

Apparently all is not well at Sony, with the company posting high losses and their share price at a 24-year low.  Some of that can be put down to the problems Japan has faced over the last year, the biggest of which, the earthquake and resultant tsunami, it will take years to recover from.  Some of the issues were of their own making though, such as the lax security on the PlayStation Network and subsequent bungling of the investigation, clean-up and relaunch.

There’s an area that is probably of much bigger concern though, one that they could fix, as of today, if they wished: they don’t make good products.  I say this as someone who doesn’t buy Sony products, I made a decision years back after a lot of bad experiences (not that I’m saying I never will again) and I will actively avoid buying something with Sony on it if I can.

Sony used to be the gold standard for many products, but that was years ago.  They used to be visionary market leaders as well, but it’s been a long time since they’ve come up with a great product and nothing I can think of comes close to the Walkman.  Their history with formats has been hit and miss, though I bet most people don’t know how many they’ve helped create, having launched 3.5″ floppy disks and co-launched CDs, but for each success there has been a Betamax, a MiniDisc (not bad) or a Memory Stick. Continue reading

Jobs was a User Experience Guy, not a Tweaker

There seems to have been a lot of discussion about the role Steve Jobs played in the industry, with Malcolm Gladwell suggesting he was a tweaker.  John Gruber argues both Gladwell and Walter Isaacson, Jobs’ official biographer, were wrong in their definition because Jobs never invented anything, let alone tweaks on other people’s designs.  He just had a vision and chose the designs he wanted.

How he chose those designs seems to be simple (from what I’ve read): user experience.  He wanted to make products people wanted to use.  If there was something clunky, or if something had a rough edge, he’d hammer away at his staff until it was smooth, like the corners on an iPod.

Look at the typical MP3 player, certainly before the iPod, and it had loads of small, fiddly buttons with complex, multi-layered menus that you’d get hideously lost in.  The first iPod still had buttons, but laid out logically for control similar to how the, now famous, click-wheel would work on later models.  The menus were easy to read, the controls simple to operate.  Once they found the method they didn’t change much, another benefit over most manufacturers, who seem to change the way their hardware works completely with every release.

To load music onto the iPod you still had to go the old route of finding your CD, ripping it onto the computer and then copying it over to the device.  The sync functionality in the associated software was designed to get around some of the mess in that process (finding the tracks you’ve ripped and copying them over).  iTunes was the solution to the rest, instead of having to go out, buy the CD and rip it into the correct format, you just went onto iTunes, did a quick search, downloaded it and voila, it synced to your device.  Loading media was a rough edge and the iTunes store was a solution to it, not just another way to make money from the hardware.

The same is true of many of Apple’s other devices.  They took the button heavy, confusing, clunky designs that everyone else’s engineers came up with and they threw them out.  They designed with simplicity and ease of use in mind, everything from the packaging to the store experience is a search for simplicity.  And jobs wouldn’t stop until they found it.

Isaacson says Jobs decided on the iPad after a friend who worked at Microsoft said they were building a tablet but that it used a stylus.  The ill-fated Newton, started while Jobs was away from Apple and cancelled not long after his return, may have had an impact on his dislike of them, but is there anyone who liked using them, they were though to be a necessary evil.  Instead of just accepting it, Jobs got his engineers to solve the problem, he wanted to use his finger, they delivered the solution.  You can see Jobs’ derision of the stylus when he announced the iPhone.

I always like the often-quoted story of Jobs redesigning the DVD burning app for OS X:

“Then Steve comes in,” [Mike] Evangelist recalls. “He doesn’t look at any of our work. He picks up a marker and goes over to the whiteboard. He draws a rectangle. ‘Here’s the new application,’ he says. ‘It’s got one window. You drag your video into the window. Then you click the button that says burn. That’s it. That’s what we’re going to make.’ “

There’s no doubt Jobs was a visionary, he saw things others didn’t, but what he was best at was delivering great products, great because they were products people could use, that people wanted to use, instead of clunky crap.  He didn’t limit himself to what was possible today, he drove his company to find the right solution, not just a solution.  One that was right for people using

Legislation Needed to Use Technology in Car Safety

There seem to have been a number of reports about big traffic incidents in the past few weeks.   The biggest was the recent crash on the M5 which killed seven people.  In addition to the deaths, a further 51 people were injured and the road was closed for 48 hours.  Last weekend the M40 closed for 10 hours after a serious accident and then the M20 had to close twice in 12 hours due to two separate accidents (though only one of those involved vehicles, six cars though).  With the onset of winter the number of accidents is only set to increase.

I keep wondering whether these accidents were avoidable.  People are fallible, no two ways about it, we make mistakes and most accidents are caused by errors in judgement, not mechanical failure (so I’m guessing, I haven’t got any specific stats on that).  So are there ways to cut down on accidents and (especially) fatalities using technology?  Absolutely. Continue reading

Time to Replace Passwords

It’s time to replace passwords with something else.  We’re being asked to remember more and more of them (yes, I know you can use something like OpenID, but that’s less secure, if someone were to crack it they have access to many more services, though in practice most people use the same one for everything anyway) and users are reaching saturation point.

I know this because I’m an IT Manager.  I have hundreds of passwords, far more than I could ever keep track of in my head (especially as some are used so rarely), so I use a piece of software (the excellent KeePass) to help me.  Most people don’t though.  I can tell you what a problem passwords are for the average user because I have to support them.

Having recently changed to a new system for our hosted email my users are forced to pick an eight-character password with various requirements to mix it up.  This then needs to be changed every 90 days (I didn’t set these rules).  Generally what happens is they tick the box for the email client to save the password and after 90 days they can’t remember it, so I have to walk them through a reset.  Most of those I stood beside when they reset it simply wrote their password down on a handy post-it, scrap of paper or notebook.  And most of them had only altered their password by changing the number at the end of it. Continue reading

Is Voice the Future of Interaction?

The launch of Siri with the iPhone 4S has brought voice control back into the limelight.  There has been voice recognition software for as long as I can remember, I played with some, probably back in the 90s, and it was never very good.  Having used Google’s Voice Search and seen Siri in action, natural language processing has obviously come on.

I’ve also seen voice control in a car first-hand recently (in a BMW, not my car) and was very impressed with how it saves the driver from taking their eyes off the road (largely) or hands off the steering wheel.  It got me thinking that, as the price is obviously starting to drop, we may be on the tipping point for voice control being rolled out to a lot more devices in the next few years.

Now with the likes of Siri and Google’s Voice Search the issue is that the actual processing, the heavy lifting, is done by servers, not on the local machine.  That approach is fine in a phone, or a tablet, or a PC, but it won’t work for the majority of devices. What I don’t know is how much of that needs to be done by the server. Continue reading

The Efficiency of Public Sector IT

Reading the comments in a BBC article about open source software, there’s the suggestion that public section IT doesn’t know what it’s doing and that private sector is so much better, so much more efficient.  Well research doesn’t support that:

Until now, large-scale software failures have been most associated with the public sector. In 2007, a European Services Strategies Unit report identified 105 UK public sector contracts with substantial cost overruns.

However, Professor Flyvbjerg believes these problems apply equally to private firms.

“People always thought that the public sector was doing worse in IT than private companies – our findings suggest they’re just as bad.

“We think government IT contracts get more attention, whereas the private sector can hide its details,” he said.

I’ve worked in IT in both sectors and, frankly, there’s little difference, aside from some additional security implications.  Let’s not forget that most public sector IT contracts (and, at least when I was there, much of the day-to-day stuff) are run by private companies/contractors.  I’ve heard suggestions that the public sector provisioning provides a lack of definition, last minute changes to scope and all manner of other hindrances that cause delays and add time, which costs money. Continue reading