I’m Not Convinced by Web TV

The big thing from CES seems to have been web-enabled TVs, again.  We seem to have been talking about them for some time, but they have yet to materialise in homes as far as I can see.

Watching this report from the BBC I didn’t see anything that would drive me out to buy a connected TV.

Now, I have a media centre PC, I’ve had one for years, so you could argue I already have a connected TV, I have access to the internet and online content.  I rarely use it for that though.  Why?  Well, because when I’m watching a program, I’m watching a program.  I don’t want to hide it while I look something up, I’d do that on a separate device (a tablet or laptop).  Which is what Scoble says in the report.  The negative point is it means looking away from a programme.

Continue reading

Will E-Books Mean Cheaper Textbooks?

So I’m reading an article over at CNN where ten tech luminaries (their words) are commenting on the future of reading and I stumble across this from author Jeannette Walls:

I think electronic readers and tablets are going to have a huge impact on the textbook business. Some textbooks cost more than $100. What student can pay for that? So I think for school books and research materials tablets will be absolutely wonderful. I’m ridiculously optimistic.

It’s a nice idea but will it mean cheaper textbooks are will they be more expensive in the long run?  Aside from the issues that publishers haven’t grasped we expect to pay less for electronic copies, the real cost of a $100 textbook isn’t the printed material.  There’s some in there, and some overhead for the fact that they need to make the investment in the typesetting etc on what will probably be a small print run.  Most of that cost, I suspect, is because this is a specialist subject and you won’t find the info anywhere else, and it took a lot of effort to accumulate it.

So making it electronic won’t make it much cheaper as the price premium will still be there but, if the current trend continues, you’ll no longer be able to buy a used copy for cheaper or sell it on once you’re done to re-coup some of the cost.  So most students may actually end up worse off with electronic textbooks.

Borderless Media

The film, TV and music industries need to get their act in gear and realise media can no longer be divided by borders.

Take, for example, the video I posted about yesterday about the Okinawa Churaumi aquarium. The author has been very careful to put links to the band site for the music he used. He has also implored people to buy the music on iTunes. It’s been working too, the band have seen a boost in sales and have posted a thanks response.

Which is great. Apart from the fact that while you can get this on iTunes in Canada (and I assume the US) and on Amazon.com mp3 downloads, you can’t get it in the UK. So while Barcelona may be shifting copies, they could be shifting a lot more as this video does the rounds (it’s already over 600,000 views on YouTube and north of 400,000 on Vimeo), but no one outside North America can buy it.

What does this mean? Piracy. If people can’t get what they want legally they’ll get it illegally. These sorts of things typically have a short shelf-life so missing the boat is costing a lot of sales. It’s time the media industries understood that they can no longer control how and where the media is consumed. We want it available immediately in a convenient format.

So DVD regions and staggered releases should be made a thing of the past, all movies, singles and TV shows should be available in every territory from the day of release. I know there’s legal and technical issues to overcome here, but this isn’t beyond the wit of man, get it sorted so we can legally buy things when we want otherwise you’ll never shake piracy.

Red Dwarf Review

I agree with the summation of Red Dwarf‘s return to the small screen from Graeme McMillan over at io9. I’m a fan of the series, not a huge fan, but I’ve seen most of the episodes and I was hoping this would spell a return after some poor later series.

Unfortunately it doesn’t look like this will be the case. Let’s start technical. The old Red Dwarf was defined by risqué, low and dirty humour mixed with clever insights and twists, this was added to by the cheap sets and physical special effects. There weren’t bad, but models were often fairly obvious and the sets small and cheap. This, like Star Wars ‘used’ universe, added depth and character, a certainly reality that much of Science-Fiction lacks, being too clean and sterile. This also meant that effects could be done on set with the actors, so the actors could shoot in front of an audience. Now they’ve gone with CGI and while some of the effects are better, some still look decidedly cheap and nasty, but in the wrong way now, plus the move to a slicker shooting format just doesn’t suit the grungy sets and outfits. The biggest thing missing is the audience’s laughter. Bring back the laughter track!

As for the story, well, relying on your characters finding out they’re just that, characters in a TV show by having them step out of the TV and spending the rest of the time recreating scenes from a movie that bears no resemblance (Blade Runner) isn’t just lame, it’s plain lazy. It lead to a terrible story that didn’t showcase the best of Dwarf. Frankly, if this is the best they could do, they don’t deserve to be back on our screens, I’ll stick with the re-runs, they’re funny than the new stuff no matter how many times you’ve watched them.